The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
语法 Sentence Correction-336
标记
正确的用户笔记
shanyuerdai 2015-01-11 10:50:08
you can only use "evidence FOR" with a theory or idea; it means that the evidence SUPPORTS that theory or idea
selenemoon 2013-10-21 12:31:55
that were cut into和ed分词cut 修饰短语一个意思，所以不如cut。。。简洁。后面句意与a项不同
Deprofundis 2014-07-09 23:22:14
evidence for idea/theory:对idea theory的支持 过去进行时时态不好，有种还在进行的感觉
sue95 2017-02-18 00:19:33
That were问题不大；evidence抽象名词！That
umasou999 2016-12-27 02:22:56
1、that were cut不如直接用过去分词做后置定语简洁，错 2、evidence后面要跟同位语that来加以说明，如果只是for后面一般是跟某个theory或idea来表达evidence支持该theory或idea，错。 3、 were arising过去分词，表示过去段时间一直进行的动作，但有可能动作还未完成，错。
halowwww 2016-12-22 13:45:19
1.evidence for is not correct。；； 2.that were arising doesnt clearly modify complex socities
杀鸡小周 2016-12-04 10:36:39
have yield时态 形式正确， that were cut 累赘 that were arising 形式累赘 且有修饰 northern regions的歧义。
wow0228 2016-11-19 17:09:45
VS E that were 省略會更精簡一點
SuperFreDWWW 2016-10-07 11:34:53
that定语从句指代不明，逻辑语义上应该指代societies，语法上有指代regions的嫌疑。 过去进行时不太好，因为这里没有强调两个行为动作在时间起始和延续上的对比，只是单纯表示同时的意思。
meiyouyhm 2016-09-21 11:22:42
that were cut不如直接done做后置定语简洁；evidence后面要跟同位语从句来说明evidence的具体内容，而evidence for后面是要跟某个theory或idea来表达evidence支持该theory或idea的；were arising时态错，好像在表达rise在那段时间之后还没有结束，应该用一般过去时更合理；第二个that就近修饰northern regions的歧义。
yuanqr 2016-07-18 11:30:46
evidence后面要跟同位语从句来说明evidence的具体内容，而evidence for后面是要跟某个theory或idea来表达evidence支持该theory或idea的；were arising时态错，好像在表达rise在那段时间之后还没有结束，应该用一般过去时更合理；
chrisding123 2016-07-07 14:01:15
yield strong evidence for : 为了什么提供了有效证据
annie654 2016-05-11 16:03:31
evidence that...
