A recent review of pay scales indicates that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980.
语法 Sentence Correction-3402
标记
正确的用户笔记
shannii 2013-09-24 16:27:16
a ratio that compares的compare不能用主动方式表达，应该是被比较sth be compared to…的省略形式（省略了主语和系动词，是惯用法）
六之风 2013-11-17 20:05:59
ceo‘s 是ceo的复数形式。compares to没有这个用法，都会被compared的。qie compare两个对象一定要可比。ratio和times也不可比
慕一 2014-05-08 20:59:35
a ratio that compares的compare不能用主动方式表达
ronlee 2017-01-12 21:14:08
compare不能用主动
tiatao 2017-01-12 00:37:39
compares to is awkward, and can not use as active voice. ratio can not be compared with 42 times. not parallel
Seech 2017-01-06 08:50:13
a ratio 不能主动去对比
kakisama 2017-01-04 09:04:37
compare to 不能用主动，只能被动compared to ,这里用主动错了。
Sun_xh720 2016-12-30 03:57:17
ratio不能主动compare
halowwww 2016-12-21 12:37:46
you cannot leave 'times' hanging like this. sometimes you can use pronouns - the height of the sears tower is more than four times that of the statue of liberty - but you can't use empty space.
停不下来的雕兄 2016-12-20 22:33:04
choice b is badly worded: 'compares to 42 times in 1980' seems to say that, on forty-two different occasions in 1980, the ceo:blue-collar ratio reached 419:1. this is not what we are trying to say. more generally, when speaking about ratios as is done here, you cannot leave 'times' hanging like this. sometimes you can use pronouns - the height of the sears tower is more than four times that of the statue of liberty - but you can't use empty space. choice c exhibits proper usage of 'times' followed by their pay. it also uses the ratio, a correct identification of exactly what is being described.
Jesterleir 2016-12-20 21:31:17
that compares to 用法不对，应该是be compared to
Jesterleir 2016-12-20 21:30:14
比较对象不对等，前面说的是工资数，后面是比率
WYKMF！ 2016-12-05 19:13:17
应该为 a ratio compared to
