A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.
语法 Sentence Correction-3401
标记
正确的用户笔记
Ines要上700 2016-07-04 00:10:04
yeah, i think you're right: the comparison made in choice a is ok. it's not quite as ideally worded as the comparison in choices b-c-d, but, as can be seen in saurabh's ron/bush example, it's fine. the real problems with choice a: - 'the ratio of 42 times' is redundant; it'd be good enough just to say '42 times'. note that the word 'ratio' is not redundant in choices c-d, since it's being used as a modifier to make a logical connection. - it doesn't say 42 times what. not only is that unacceptably vague, but it also breaks parallelism
mithril1989 2013-12-27 15:42:42
an average of 419 times more pay，compared to a ratio pay与ratio不能比
刘文颖 2014-07-15 09:49:42
A recent review… indicates that…, CEO'S earn…, as compared to… 主语是review，谓语是indicates，后跟that引导的宾语从句说明indicate的内容，宾语从句的主语是 CEO's，谓语是earn，宾语是419 times the pay of blue-collar workers，后跟比较结构as compared to…，the ratio是42 times their pay的同位语。 CEO's 是 CEO 的复数形式，以缩写字母组成的专有名词的复数形式可以是加's 或加 s。 考点：比较、句子结构 比较-compare/contrast 的用法，(as) compared to/with（GMAT 没有区分 to 和 with 的区别），省略了主语和系动词，即 A be compared with/to B，与 in contrast to 都是惯用法，前后比较对象一定 要对等。 常见的错误用法有：将 compare 用作主动(when compare…; comparing…)，比较对象 不对等。句子结构-宾语从句，正式书面语中，宾语从句的引导词 that 不能省略。 选项分析 (A) compared to的比较对象不对等，前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数， 而后者a ratio of是比率。 (B) a ratio that compares的compare不能用主动方式表达，应该是被比较sth be compared to…的省略形式（省略了主语和系动词，是惯用法）；compare to的比较对象不对象等，前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数，而后者42 times是比率。 (C) 正确，as compared to比较结构，419 times the pay与42 times their pay比较，the ratio…是同位语。 (D) 缺少that引导宾语从句；indicates CEO's who…句子结构不完整，缺少谓语，who引导定语从句 修饰名词CEO's。 (E) 缺少that引导宾语从句；indicates CEO's earning…句子结构不完整，缺少谓语；compare to的 比较对象不对等，前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数，而后者42 times是 比率。
ronlee 2017-01-12 21:17:47
average of 419 times 419倍多的平均，与平均高出了419不一致
das123456 2016-12-11 13:13:12
the ratio of 42 times' is redundant; it'd be good enough just to say '42 times'.
leahliulliu1 2016-11-17 15:02:59
compare前后一个是419 times more pay，一个是ratio，不可以比
励志yy 2016-11-11 12:48:56
earn不能和ratio进行compare
Zee5284 2016-10-31 01:26:31
CEO's 是 CEO 的复数形式，以缩写字母组成的专有名词的复数形式可以是加's 或加 s。
比较-compare/contrast 的用法，(as) compared to/with（GMAT 没有区分 to 和 with 的区别），省略了主语和系动词，即 A be compared with/to B，与 in contrast to 都是惯用法，前后比较对象一定 要对等。
常见的错误用法有：将 compare 用作主动(when compare…; comparing…)，比较对象 不对等。
(A) compared to的比较对象不对等，前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数， 而后者a ratio of是比率。
取个名字太麻烦 2016-09-27 21:35:08
compared to的比较对象不对等，前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数， 而后者a ratio of是比率。
yaomaczhang 2016-09-27 03:35:27
比较多对象不对
francescao 2016-09-10 04:57:53
CEO'S can not be compared with a ratio
yaomaczhang 2016-09-07 06:02:50
比较多对象是， ratio和工资数
yaomaczhang 2016-08-31 05:54:47
比较对象不正确。 419 times more pay vs. ratio
