SA was one of the influential artists, who......这里who不涉及跳跃修饰(如果出现在题目选项中,若题干中出现则有上下文,我们可以看懂修饰的是谁,但是做题让你选,就不能选,有歧义。),指代不清,可以使SA,也可以是后面那个artists.
who能够跳过谓语指代注意stella是很违反GMAT语法规则的。
The original sentence contains a number of modifiers, but not all of them are correctly expressed. The clause who trained describes Stella Adler, yet a relative clause such as this one must be placed immediately after the noun or pronoun it modifies, and this clause follows theatre rather than Adler. Replacing who trained with training corrects the error because the phrase training...modifies the whole preceding clause rather than the single preceding noun. Several generations of actors including shows the same error in reverse; including modifies the whole phrase, but the two actors named are not generations of actors. The more limiting whose ranks included (referring to actors) is appropriate here. The original sentence contains a number of modifiers, but not all of them are correctly expressed. The clause who trained describes Stella Adler, yet a relative clause such as this one must be placed immediately after the noun or pronoun it modifies, and this clause follows theatre rather than Adler. Replacing who trained with training corrects the error because the phrase training...modifies the whole preceding clause rather than the single preceding noun. Several generations of actors including shows the same error in reverse; including modifies the whole phrase, but the two actors named are not generations of actors. The more limiting whose ranks included (referring to actors) is appropriate here.
A句的who可以指代最近的名词Artists 可以指代Stella 涉嫌指代不清 相比之下C选项的,training就很清晰,做伴随状语,只能修饰主语
who有可能指代artists
who 从句离所修饰的Stella太远了?
引导词要紧跟先行词 后边的核心词汇是generation,所以与including不搭配。
who你大爷的离Stella太远了!!!指代不明确
who只能修饰influential artists而不是 SA,而且跟在了therter后面
who 指代不清
the actors were not "including" Brando and DeNiro. Those two were included in the group of actors, but not in the actors themselves! (Brando was a pretty big guy--if he were hiding inside another actor, we'd be able to tell!) That's why we have the added word "ranks" in C or E, which are therefore the only viable options. Without "ranks," we are saying either that Brando & DeNiro are inside the other actors or (somewhat less absurdly) that the other actors are including B & D, as in a playground activity. Neither of these seems to be the intended meaning!
Although there are exceptions to the touch rule, we can't have a noun modifier crossing over both the verb and subsequent modifiers to refer back to the main subject.
Although there are exceptions to the touch rule, we can't have a noun modifier crossing over both the verb and subsequent modifiers to refer back to the main subject.
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习