Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
【选项】Dietz made money on sales of canned tuna last year.
只能理解成,该选项描述的是去年的真实情况,没法削弱对“further economic interest 将无贡献”的结论
D, the argument is not about profits only, but about whether the advertising campaign contributed to the economic interest of the company
D, the argument is not about profits only, but about whether the advertising campaign contributed to the economic interest of the company 是made money了,但是广告亏欠了,而且题目问的是没有further经济效益了。
made money就是等于有profit嘛,等于重复了原文。而文章的结论是广告对远期的经济利益没有影响,要注意是further Dietz's economic interests.
是有收入,但是减过广告成本还是亏了
Dietz made money on sales, but the profits is smaller than ads. So ads will not work in future. strength or can not refer to .
一般陈述原文信息都不是正确答案
选项去年总利润为正,试图和今年是否盈利对比来削弱。题目说今年比广告成本少的那个值是“profits from the additional sales” 是今年纯增加的利润,没有说今年总利润为负。没有削弱。
有帮助,但却不是最有效那个。
赚钱与compaign有没有关系并么有说。
make money赚了钱,但是只是去年 ,又能怎么样
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习