逻辑 Critical Reasoning-15724

标记
A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz's economic interests.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】Dietz made money on sales of canned tuna last year.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

ypheroin 2016-03-23 09:09:24

只能理解成,该选项描述的是去年的真实情况,没法削弱对“further economic interest 将无贡献”的结论

0个赞

echo3104 2014-09-03 10:17:00

D, the argument is not about profits only, but about whether the advertising campaign contributed to the economic interest of the company

0个赞

lilyli0138 2016-01-20 22:38:42

D, the argument is not about profits only, but about whether the advertising campaign contributed to the economic interest of the company 是made money了,但是广告亏欠了,而且题目问的是没有further经济效益了。

0个赞

战斗乔 2016-08-08 21:42:34

made money就是等于有profit嘛,等于重复了原文。而文章的结论是广告对远期的经济利益没有影响,要注意是further Dietz's economic interests.

0个赞

lovehideto 2016-07-07 12:02:02

是有收入,但是减过广告成本还是亏了

0个赞

greentea 2015-10-15 02:15:31

Dietz made money on sales, but the profits is smaller than ads. So ads will not work in future. strength or can not refer to .

0个赞

alice94 2015-08-24 23:24:33

一般陈述原文信息都不是正确答案

0个赞

khuntoria950817 2015-08-18 22:37:03

选项去年总利润为正,试图和今年是否盈利对比来削弱。题目说今年比广告成本少的那个值是“profits from the additional sales” 是今年纯增加的利润,没有说今年总利润为负。没有削弱。

0个赞

applez 2015-08-14 01:49:18

有帮助,但却不是最有效那个。

0个赞

yyjoker15 2015-08-01 19:15:54

赚钱与compaign有没有关系并么有说。

0个赞

Euginia 2014-11-30 23:37:55

make money赚了钱,但是只是去年 ,又能怎么样

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们