逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6457

标记
The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX's decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?

【选项】Even though OLEX could consolidate all its refining at the Tasberg plant, doing so at the Grenville plant would not be feasible.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-20 23:01:20

尽管O可以consolidate所有的refining在T里,但对于G不能这样做,无关,杀

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-14 11:04:08

这条说的是t优于g,不能解释为什么保留g,跑题,无关。要削若的是有利润上的原因使得g保留

0个赞

取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-04 10:22:07

在T可以实现consolidate all its refining,但在G不能实现consolidate all its refining,与题目无关。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们