逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6456

标记
The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX's decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?

【选项】The Grenville refinery, although it operates at a higher cost than the Tasberg refinery, has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

zyyamy 2014-07-01 16:25:49

过去盈利也推不出未来会盈利啊

0个赞

ccccchhhhh 2015-07-12 08:20:11

一定注意时间状语,尤其是以过去的时间段推测将来的,肯定错

0个赞

Sparrow_7 2016-05-06 23:38:18

1. 过去盈利不能推出未来盈利 2. 原文已说在盈利的情况下仍要通过关闭来削减成本,那么就不能重申原文

0个赞

取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-04 10:20:40

一定注意时间状语,尤其是以过去的时间段推测将来的。过去盈利也推不出未来会盈利【has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years】。

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-08-07 23:23:09

social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits. 关键词是higher

0个赞

caymon 2016-03-14 11:09:00

1. 过去盈利不能推出未来盈利 2. 原文已说在盈利的情况下仍要通过关闭来削减成本,那么就不能重申原文

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-14 11:04:59

g成本高利润低,不利于保留,无关。要的是利润方面关于g保留的解释。

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-15 16:40:34

即使之前profitable,OLEX也决定了shut down,但是中途又不shut down肯定因为其他因素不是因为之前profitable,可能是social concerns,这个选项没解释是否突然出现除经济因素外的其他考虑而不是social concerns

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-20 23:00:32

G尽管运营费用比T高,但它在很多年里有适度的盈利,不怎么能说明O关注盈利比社会责任多

0个赞

Phoebeqqe 2014-10-02 10:45:36

时间范围不对,profitable for many years不代表未来都会盈利

0个赞

huqiao1993 2014-09-06 13:54:24

A 选项大家应该看的是for many years. 什么意思?过去一直赢利,推不出来未来会盈利。所以如果说百分之百的证明未来会有利可图,A 就对了。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们