In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
语法 Sentence Correction-4306
标记
正确的用户笔记
孟小满 2015-07-20 09:47:52
如果用 逗号+with... 即 ... ...【 , 】【 with ...】 那么【with修饰的是逗号前面的整句话】， 就变成了the Council began publishing SBW的主题是XXX了。 （变成了council做这件事的主题，实际上应该为【SBW这个东西的主题是XXX】）
cmcm180 2014-10-30 12:54:57
用with引导的非限定性短语做伴随状语错误，修饰整个句子，began publishing用thesis
cmcm180 2014-10-30 12:55:43
thesis后面用of不好，thesis变成了某一类特定的consumers，而合理含义上应该是一个thesis应该是某个现象，因此要改为that从句(同位语从句)，或者用冒号来引出从句
ChessyG 2016-12-08 13:32:30
From Ron: in both (a) and (b), "having the power..." is an -ing modifier that's not followed by a comma. therefore, it's a modifier that serves as an adjective, modifying the immediately preceding noun (= "consumers"). the problem, then, is that this modifier - since it's a modifier - can be omitted from the basic structure of the sentence, leaving behind the following skeleton: ...with the simple thesis of consumers. uh-oh. consumers aren't a thesis. this problem plagues both choice (a) and choice (b). 也就是说，逻辑上thesis 是customer 这一行为，所以customer's having power...才是the objective of "thesis of", otherwise, it will be the "thesis of customer"因为having这里是形容词
糯米团子QUQ 2016-10-02 14:47:09
区分一东西和一事儿！！！consumers having是分词结构表伴随，它只能表示一东西，也就是consumers，而非顾客怎么怎么样这件事情，但书的主题摆明了是一件事情而不是一个东西，【区分东西和事情】所有的consumers加分词结构全部杀掉。
CelesteTOEFL 2016-09-14 11:40:41
thesis的解释应该用that。 用of感觉是。。。的理论。意思不对。
凡糕君 2016-07-15 17:33:27
用with引导的非限定性短语做伴随状语错误，而事实上，thesis是Shopping for a Better World这本书的主题，不能作为前面整句话的伴随；thesis后面用of不好，thesis变成了某一类特定的consumers，而合理含义上应该是一个thesis应该是某个现象，因此要改为that从句(同位语从句)，或者用冒号来引出从句。
IAMBACK 2016-06-17 19:56:23
后面的话是形容这本书的内容而不是前面的动作
hoper 2016-05-08 09:39:03
选项分析 A. 用with引导的非限定性短语做伴随状语错误，而事实上，thesis是Shopping for a Better World这本书的主题，不能作为前面整句话的伴随；thesis后面用of不好，thesis变成了某一类特定的consumers，而合理含义上应该是一个thesis应该是某个现象，因此要改为that从句(同位语从句)，或者用冒号来引出从句。
ada673820270 2016-04-27 09:19:06
comma+with修饰整句，但逻辑上应修饰sfbw，而不是cep of不好
ada673820270 2016-04-27 09:19:04
comma+with修饰整句，但逻辑上应修饰sfbw，而不是cep of不好
tian4690 2016-03-24 05:48:00
comma + with = comma + prepositional modifier...modifies the entire previous clause.......which is not correct....it should modify the immediate preceding noun....so we should not use comma + preposition setup.
jessicachow 2016-01-30 19:25:14
comma with修饰的是整句话。
