The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to 0,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell them later.
语法 Sentence Correction-3107
标记
正确的用户笔记
lyqsunny 2014-06-26 00:17:20
(B) in 1999位置不对,导致修饰不清,到底是1999的法案，还是1999的通过？;with the sole intent that they will sell表达复杂,笨拙.
cocowu 2014-07-22 14:15:03
intent of is the right diction
小毯子1994 2015-05-14 10:08:34
in 1999应该紧邻被修饰对象
wulfsax 2017-01-06 11:25:17
1999后面是which，修饰不当
halowwww 2016-12-26 15:40:34
和C比较，B不好：* "the intent that they will..." is unidiomatic. * the "which" erroneously refers to "1999".
leahliulliu1 2016-11-16 01:20:27
which要直接跟在被修饰词act之后，且in1999跟在act后面就变成1999的法案，跟在passage之后就是1999的通过。代词they和them不是同一个。
leahliulliu1 2016-11-16 01:20:24
which要直接跟在被修饰词act之后，且in1999跟在act后面就变成1999的法案，跟在passage之后就是1999的通过。代词they和them不是同一个。
leahliulliu1 2016-11-16 01:20:23
which要直接跟在被修饰词act之后，且in1999跟在act后面就变成1999的法案，跟在passage之后就是1999的通过。代词they和them不是同一个。
leahliulliu1 2016-11-16 01:20:19
which要直接跟在被修饰词act之后，且in1999跟在act后面就变成1999的法案，跟在passage之后就是1999的通过。代词they和them不是同一个。
Monicca 2016-11-14 20:58:27
被修饰对象和修饰要紧紧的在一起~passage应该和in 1999连在一起
Lottieeee 2016-09-18 20:34:04
"the intent that they will..." is unidiomatic.
张三0925 2016-08-11 16:40:31
in 1999 的位置有歧义，放在后面更像Act是1999年的
snow199511 2016-06-25 16:07:41
which修饰1999 sole intent that they will sell = awkward
