More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.
语法 Sentence Correction-2945
标记
正确的用户笔记
仲夏夜之梦 2014-05-02 23:38:51
Baikal和Lakes combined对比不成立，不能拿河流和水量来比
martinachoi 2015-12-15 13:45:55
做SC的时候 不要去用语法知识做题目。因为E的形式上是那么的完美，但是从比较的逻辑意义上来看居然是错的。combined 是指水的容量， 然后说的是一个湖。 所以这样的比较内容是不对的。世界淡水总储量的20%超过了北美五大湖淡水量的总和，而不是贝尔加湖超过。
fishanne 2015-12-25 00:05:43
Baikal和Lakes combined对比不成立，不能拿河流和水量来比 when you have an INITIAL MODIFIER THAT'S NOT A CLAUSE (i.e., it doesn't have its own subject and verb), then it must modify the immediately following noun. example: coming home from school, the wind blew me off my bike. --> INCORRECT, because the implication is that the wind itself was "coming home from school". coming home from school, i was blown off my bike by the wind. --> correct (even though the passive voice is used). -- same problem in choice (e), which implies that lake baikal itself is somehow "more than all the North American Great Lakes combined". that doesn't make sense. the above rule is completely rigid, too; it doesn't allow for the modifier to be used in any other way.
shisu0610041 2017-01-08 19:50:15
with在句中就近修饰名词（Siberia's Lake Baikal），那么语义就变成了贝加尔湖带着300多条河流入自己。。。语义不对，应该把with放在句首或者句尾修饰整个句子
tiatao 2017-01-01 11:27:18
Baikal和Lakes combined对比不成立，不能拿河流和水量来比
tiatao 2017-01-01 11:27:18
Baikal和Lakes combined对比不成立，不能拿河流和水量来比
停不下来的雕兄 2016-12-18 19:39:47
句首的修饰词百分百修饰最近的名词，湖比什么什么多不符合逻辑
ChessyG 2016-12-07 08:44:51
it is not the lake more than all...combined, but the water of the two comparing with each other
hoshinonana 2016-11-25 21:47:50
with在句中，修饰前面名词
hoshinonana 2016-11-25 21:47:48
with在句中，修饰前面名词
就不信了 2016-11-14 14:30:42
比较对象不对等 水量不能喝贝加尔湖比
Monicca 2016-11-13 21:25:49
这道题和之前的一题很像，二者比较，S lake比美国五大湖多，这里的多没有限定，因此有歧义，应该是先说lake有超过20%的淡水，然后自然引出比较的对象——淡水多
leahliulliu1 2016-11-13 17:10:23
Baikal和Lakes combined对比不成立，不能拿河流和水量来比；只能水量和水量比
