was没有主语
句子结构 -主干谓语动词错误
起草的人是ECS没错,但后面紧跟was a call,逻辑就错了
前面半句缺乏逻辑主语 后面半句缺少语句 句子结构复杂
Error Analysis: 1. Modifier “When drafting …” is ambiguous in its role. We don’t know what it is modifying. 2. This sentence needs to be written in a way so that the meaning is easy to comprehend. POE: Choice A: When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Conventions in 1848, included n it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement. Incorrect for the reason stated above. Choice B: Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Conventions in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote. Incorrect. 1. The opening modifier is illogically modifying “a draft”. The draft did not do the action of including the call. 2. This choice fails to say that who included the call for women enfranchisement in the DoS. Choice C: When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it. Incorrect. This choice fails to say who included the call in the DoS. Choice D: A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Convention. Incorrect. This choice lacks a main verb and hence is a fragment. Choice E: When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement. Correct. All the information is clearly given in this choice. PS- Pronoun “it” clearly refers to DoS because the sentence clearly says that Stanton drafted the DoS, and when she drafted it, she included in “it” (DoS) the call for women enfranchisement.
When....., was a call for....
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments .....的逻辑主语是ECS,但是was a call for female enfranchisement 的主语是什么?明显不可能是ECS。 主句的主语缺失,排除
分句逻辑主语是人与主句主语不一致,主动好于被动
draft的逻辑主语是Elizabeth, 其一,逻辑主语和动作离得过远。后面included 这一句读了半天才读懂 说的就是 在里面 作者时动作的发出者 包括了a call... 比较而言 主动优于被动。
draft的逻辑主语是Elizabeth, 其一,逻辑主语和动作离得过远。后面included 这一句读了半天才读懂 说的就是 在里面 作者时动作的发出者 包括了a call... 比较而言 主动优于被动。
draft的逻辑主语是Elizabeth, 其一,逻辑主语和动作离得过远。后面included 这一句读了半天才读懂 说的就是 在里面 作者时动作的发出者 包括了a call... 比较而言 主动优于被动。
draft的逻辑主语是Elizabeth, 其一,逻辑主语和动作离得过远。后面included 这一句读了半天才读懂 说的就是 在里面 作者时动作的发出者 包括了a call... 比较而言 主动优于被动。
draft的逻辑主语是Elizabeth, 其一,逻辑主语和动作离得过远。后面included 这一句读了半天才读懂 说的就是 在里面 作者时动作的发出者 包括了a call... 比较而言 主动优于被动。
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习