Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
【选项】Even if the warming trend continues, there will still be years in which guillemot chicks are killed by an unusually early snow.
早雪杀,无关
假设了有early snow,still be years在这些年鸟依然会被杀死,确实不会enlarge,但是不会影响总体北上enlarge
即使变暖,需要几年guillemot chick被不同寻常的早雪杀,无关,杀
根据文章不能确定 early snow会具体的发生在更暖和的地方还是更冷的地方,故不能确定是加强条件还是削弱条件
An exceptional year is not an argument against an enlarged range because an unusually early snow could happen in the southern Arctic as well.
幼鸟被杀不等于鸟类总体,无关
G靠薄冰下的鱼为生;需要无冰期养小G-温度上升,G的活动范围可以从最南边往北拓展 A即使在变暖和,距小G被不寻常的雪杀死还有几年-没关系.. BG的捕食者也会向北扩展-不影响G的扩展呀 CG住在温度更高的海滨-重复原文,无关 D温度上升,最南边的薄冰就化了-没有鱼吃,因而活动范围只是迁移,而没有扩大,有效削弱 E鱼...主体错误
关键词:G,feed on fish beneath thin, nest nearby, range limited to, enlarged,extended northward; 选项:weaken;Not A; P:G-------->birds of Arctic region and feed on fish beneath thin ice. to feed chicks in warm place, range limited to S coast; C: if warming continues, G enlarge range by extending northward; A即使温度持续提高 鸟仔也需要几年的时间才会被早雪杀死 这选项说的是什么呀 和原文一点关系也没有
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习