逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12280

标记
Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

【选项】Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-14 10:49:48

淡水开采跟海洋开采的费用是否相同。文中压根儿没提过淡水开采,范围出去了。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-09-27 23:21:29

说到freshwater,无关,杀

0个赞

snow199511 2016-06-08 16:28:20

irrelevant

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-06-04 15:57:48

无关的主体出现了,这都错.. 而且说的还是similar cost!就算淡水提取成本低,但文章问的是 是不是成本不降,就不用【海水提U】主体主体主体!

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们