逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12279

标记
Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

【选项】Whether the total amount of uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

fishanne 2015-12-26 16:51:03

就算数量特别多也无法推出——这个办法commercically viable。量多不一定用, 不要带入自己的主观想法。

0个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-14 10:49:00

海水中U的量是否明显多于陆地上U的量。多了又怎么样,多了,成本高不还是不用么。少了成本高,不也是不用么。 只要别去引申,这个选项就肯定是错的。如果引申成:陆地上的量少,应该保护陆地资源,去开采海洋的。那就会选错。所以选项一定不能多想,客观客观再客观。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-09-27 23:21:05

数量比较,无关,杀

0个赞

snow199511 2016-06-08 16:28:05

huge amount of U in seawater means cost will be reduced?

0个赞

valora0909 2014-10-08 00:12:14

就算数量特别多也无法推出——这个办法commercically viable。不要带入自己的主观想法。

0个赞

潮状呼吸 2014-08-31 20:26:47

资源相对多少又怎么样,多就一定cost低吗? 不要带入自己的主观意图

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们