逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12257

标记
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.

Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

【选项】In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

羊咩咩在动物园 2015-07-02 21:17:28

原文讨论的就是这个only的video rent outlet,你牵扯到这个讨论对象之外的都是错的,GMAT很喜欢出的一种错误选项。而且two new outlets也和only one video rent outlet是矛盾的。所以,做题的时候不用管,直接把讨论对象之外的选项去掉。

0个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-13 14:26:57

1994年有两个只租不卖的店在C开了。开了新的租赁店,为什么租赁总量还减少呢。根本不能作为B的其他原因去解释。从而无法反驳J。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-25 01:01:31

新的两个租的但不买video的outlet在C开了,无关,杀

0个赞

Annie_Zhang 2015-10-12 09:11:46

不sell,所以比较对象只是单方面的

0个赞

khuntoria950817 2015-08-18 22:27:24

加强B的观点,而问题问的是削弱B的观点

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-06-14 20:38:07

Brad:肯定有除V开张以外的原因 B:还有其他开张的店--》加强

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们