逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12051

标记
Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees. Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol. Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however. Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

VIVI16 2014-10-05 22:27:15

0个赞 赞 Cindygmat 2014-09-19 21:13:25 早期治疗不会减少中风的可能性,无关,杀

0个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-06 11:29:18

这个选项是在说上保险是否有效果。把前提削弱了。并没有涉及S对R没有商业激励的影响。

0个赞

ryanleez73 2015-10-19 11:23:07

该选项完全无关,根据结论要选S有incentive去提供tt的选项。 当初读Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years理解错误。应该是R的员工都做不长时间就走了

0个赞

SCB 2017-01-08 22:12:49

无关选项

0个赞

SCB 2017-01-08 22:12:48

无关选项

0个赞

战斗乔 2016-08-02 20:57:46

要削弱的结论是S没有商业动机为R提供早期检测和治疗服务,而选项说的确实早期治疗不能消除中风的可能性,跟结论无关,驳斥的不是原文结论部分,而是证据部分(原文已经说了早期治疗能够预防中风),证据是不能怀疑的。

0个赞

love刘小宅 2016-02-29 21:15:04

这个选项是在说上保险是否有效果。把前提削弱了。并没有涉及S对R没有商业激励的影响。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-09-19 21:13:25

早期治疗不会减少中风的可能性,无关,杀

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们