逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7213

标记
Paleontologist: About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. Many bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.

In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

ClaireXu 2015-10-20 15:47:24

12同向

0个赞

ayya123 2015-04-05 13:49:13

第一个黑体是结论 不是改变的解释也就是因

0个赞

Euginia 2014-12-01 09:52:05

The first不是an explanation,也并不是被challenged的

0个赞

王大卫 2015-11-11 13:28:48

1.2同向;1不是explanation,probably表示这是一种假设

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们