逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7140

标记
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

ritarong 2015-02-07 16:39:51

这个在说打价格战的原理 和结论无关 结论是要说明 eliminating competition can be profitable in the long run

0个赞

igmat800 2016-11-27 21:54:26

该选项说的是number多了,so咋了,跟这个竞争对手的竞争有神马关系吗?而且也只是说了降价啊,没有说以后恢复价格的时候啊。

0个赞

陈圈圈o_O 2014-12-15 07:07:44

无关

0个赞

monster怪獸 2016-03-16 19:54:35

undercut的英文释义是:sell cheaper than one's competition。 原文的argument是说,如果成功赢得价格战的公司,企图用高价格收回当时打价格战的损失的话,会给竞争对手一个更好的用价格战反击的机会。 问:一下哪项最好的削弱了原文的论点

0个赞

王eee_q 2014-08-05 12:24:12

conclusion:恢复高价后,竞争对手还是没有机会参与竞争 E:整个市场扩大了,与竞争对手无关

0个赞

jusankucongcong 2014-06-11 21:00:57

过度推断

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们