逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7139

标记
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

丢丢鱼 2014-06-14 18:10:32

经典错误,想多了

0个赞

zjy1121 2016-12-08 11:21:14

D选项只是加强了,价格战会导致一些公司直接放弃整个航线转移去另一个,而不是缩小规模在竞争中苟延残喘,加强了第一句话。但没有从long-run上说,如果那个method成功后,占领那航线的公司加价,那么其他竞争者完全可以shift回来,再竞争,但是B说在这种情况下,占领者还是会cut价格的,所以不会给竞争者better opportunity,直接weaken最后一句话

0个赞

honeydew 2016-10-02 20:41:04

无关

0个赞

Hellosaaama 2016-10-30 16:58:29

没有提到方案(降价)

0个赞

pnps 2016-10-18 00:42:56

与原文根本就没有关系

0个赞

纯洁小吹吹吹 2016-04-14 17:14:31

没有b来的直接

0个赞

羊咩咩在动物园 2015-06-28 17:05:01

要weaken的是“However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable ”【所以应该证明可以profitable】

0个赞

stella712 2015-04-08 07:47:14

经典错误,想多了

0个赞

陈圈圈o_O 2014-12-15 07:07:29

无关

0个赞

丢丢鱼 2014-06-14 18:10:35

经典错误,想多了

0个赞

丢丢鱼 2014-06-14 18:10:34

经典错误,想多了

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们