逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6539

标记
Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland's steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland's steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

【选项】Because of advances in order-taking, shipping, and inventory systems, the cost of shipping steel from foreign producers to Krenland has fallen considerably in recent years.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-02 17:56:18

读句子读仔细了!!!选项说的是外国制造商的成本减小,跟题目是否要限制进口钢铁无关。

0个赞

hippocsq 2016-11-28 16:29:54

进口钢的成本低,竞争力增强,那还是应该对进口钢施压。。没有削弱argument

0个赞

T100G700 2015-09-23 20:39:04

选项说:生铁的进口比原来更便宜了——进口更多——失业更多 (n)

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-19 09:24:00

运输成本问题,无关,杀

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们