逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6536

标记
Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland's steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland's steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

【选项】Because steel from Krenland is rarely competitive in international markets, only a very small portion of Krenlandian steelmakers' revenue comes from exports.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-03-28 09:33:04

收入占比多少,和原文结论没有关系。

0个赞

blingvivienne 2016-07-10 15:34:02

无关,杀。 题目结论是如果政府减少进口,能保护钢铁公司和提高K的行业就业率。注意这里指整个行业的就业率而非仅仅钢铁行业的就业率。【CR要精读题目】C: 钢铁公司如果不减低成本的话,高价的钢铁卖给其他制造企业会导致他们原料成本上升,不利于这些制造企业生存,可能会影响行业就业率。

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-10-12 09:47:55

【题干理解】 低价钢铁的进口不仅导致国内销售量的下降,更加导致了失业率提高-->减少低价钢铁的进口就能保护国内的钢铁市场和就业率 A K自己的出口所占比例很少--无关 B 禁止补贴的国际条约没有惩处措施--无关 C 对很多生产商而言生铁是原材料的很大一部分--不管是不是禁止进口,降低成本才是该做的重头戏 D运输成本的降低-无关 EK过内外钢铁工人的酬金不一样-无关

0个赞

seline_lover 2015-11-02 10:26:10

产品竞争性对出口的影响,与原文无关。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-19 09:20:56

只有少部分的收入来自出口,无关,杀

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们