逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6537

标记
Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland's steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland's steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

【选项】The international treaties that some governments are violating by giving subsidies to steelmakers do not specify any penalties for such violations.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

香蕉小姐 2015-05-07 19:23:00

不关心外国怎么样,重点在于not only steel companies but also industrial employment!

0个赞

are 2016-04-27 18:24:13

not + any/ most/ only/ all 这样的绝对化词汇,典型的必错选项。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-19 09:22:20

国际条约问题,无关,杀

0个赞

leelokwan 2015-10-12 12:59:23

specify any penalties 指定任何处罚。 国际条例罚不罚与argument无关。 以后不管看不看得懂,大概看到与argument无关的东西就不要选!!!

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们