逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6353

标记
Vorland's government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants' revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants' revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government's plan?

【选项】Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

zyyamy 2014-07-01 16:30:53

关系太远了!!!

0个赞

Maxim712 2017-09-08 21:12:15

脑补过多 认为因为吸烟人数本来就在下降了,所以禁言餐馆对人群没有太明显的限制力,所以不是禁言本身不会影响餐馆生意,只是情况自己变了恰好把这个影响的严重性削弱了(本来吸烟的人如果多,那么这些禁言餐馆这些人都不会去,餐馆生意就被禁言标牌影响了;但是如果本来吸烟人数就在下降,那影响就不那么明显了) 但是P已经说了这些餐馆生意好像不光没差还变好了呢,这样一来这个选项根本解释不了,就算吸烟的人在变少,能少到跟所有人不吸烟一样效果吗,多少还是有那么些吸烟的人,那么这些人就还是不会去禁言餐馆,那么这些餐馆生意还是会被影响掉一点的【所以这个选项和P不符合】 PS:已经脑补超多了

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们