逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6351

标记
Vorland's government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants' revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants' revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government's plan?

【选项】When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurants' revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-18 05:00:57

理解:objection - 禁烟会导致收入下降 -> 反对的plan是:禁烟不会导致收入下降
问题:削弱plan - 禁烟不会不使收入下降 - 收入不会增加
手段目的题:不能使plan实施 - plan自身有问题实施不了,plan实施了达不到目的(收入不下降),是其他原因导致目的达到。
选项:短期内证明收入会下降 - 首先证明了收入下降,是支持了objection的观点,其次短期证明如何不能削弱plan是否达到goal

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们