逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6325

标记
Editorial:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

【选项】People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

wuyuewen1993 2014-04-15 13:14:46

注意:文章结论是:失业人员没有经济激励去获得一份低于政府补助的工资的工作 keyword:经济激励! 选项中说:人们有时不是为了钱而是为了爱好而去工作。 虽然说明了失业人员可能接受一份低于政府补助的工资的工作,但是不能削弱文章推理,因为和经济激励无关。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-23 11:22:20

接受工作的人是因为他们享受工作,无关,杀

0个赞

稳定的玉米投手 2016-09-25 20:57:56

人们有时候接受工资低的工作 仅仅因为他们享受工作

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-07-18 10:57:10

注意问题问的是financial incentive;E算他因,但是不在题目所讨论的“经济因素”范围内

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们