逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6321

标记
Editorial:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

【选项】The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-18 10:09:55

P:为降低失业率,政府补贴给没达到最低标准的人,使他们达到最低标准的收入 C:失业人员没有经济刺激找工作 - 找不找工作都可以达到最低补助
削弱:政府的补贴可以刺激失业人员找工作
预判:政府补贴可以刺激找工作,政府补贴不会产生别的结果影响刺激找工作,不是别的原因刺激人员找工作
选项:不收税,鼓励他们不工作 - 是加强,不是削弱。

1个赞

稳定的玉米投手 2016-09-25 20:54:31

政府 不收税 促进了结果

0个赞

ChenVictor 2014-12-26 14:27:21

已考慮過選項 且elaborate

0个赞

queenkat 2016-10-22 21:40:09

现象解释题 首先题目里面的条件第一遍都没有看清楚 unemployed:assistance for those who has been employed but lower than assistance: supplement 但是2不会比1高 暗示也说明了1中不需要pay tax 两者相比较, 说明这个supplement还是有financial incentive的 增强 所以应该说 (C说,有工作再找工作时会找到高工资,所以赶紧找工作,这样以后就能拿高工资工作了 这就是一个激励让失业的人去找工作)

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-20 17:36:58

没工作不收税..工作了即使不收税也还不如不工作

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-20 17:36:58

没工作不收税..工作了即使不收税也还不如不工作

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-23 11:18:54

枕骨不收税在给没工作的人的援助上, 无关,杀

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们