逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6181

标记
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

【选项】many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food's having a longer shelf life

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-06-08 16:00:38

只能说明为啥支持irr,但不能有效weaken“cook更差“的结论 无关!

0个赞

lovehideto 2016-07-16 05:51:41

说IRR可以杀菌,但是会降食物营养。IRR的支持者就说IRR不比烹饪对食物的营养价值伤害大。但是这其实是无关的,因为IRR的食物都是生吃的,或者说这是一种舞蹈,因为: A说很多IRR的倡导者都是分配食物的,而如果食物能被放在货架上更久对他们更有利。跟COOKING无关

0个赞

ww58 2016-06-29 08:58:40

irr的支持者都是运送食物的,希望食物有更长shelf life

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们