逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6080

标记
Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission of these "greenhouse" gases contributes to global warming. In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.Objection: The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.

Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?

【选项】The amount of methane emitted from the landfills could be reduced if the materials whose decomposition produces methane were not discarded, but recycled.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

zkw7295 2016-04-24 15:03:30

两个比较主题要分清啊,选项要反对的是甲烷产生CO2不好,选项E说的就是甲烷比CO2影响更严重,所以把甲烷转换成CO2是好的。而D只说了甲烷自身的循环可减少,与燃不燃烧(后续处理)的论点无关

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-19 01:03:46

从landfills释放的甲烷的数量可以被减少如果产生甲烷的物质被循环利用,无关,杀

0个赞

牛蹭蹭 2015-12-05 19:10:52

原文是要wekean燃烧methane产生二氧化碳不好。 此选项是说垃圾场释放的甲烷气可以被减少如果材料被分解

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2016-01-12 09:03:44

这句话本身看起来有理有据,但是不切题。文中说的是甲烷的后续处理方法,通过燃烧排放。而这句话说的是如何从根源上减少甲烷的产生量,这是两个不同的概念。不管甲烷减少了多少还是要排放的,因此最终会回到文章讨论的话题,这才是我们该关心的

0个赞

lwjwxl 2014-04-28 13:32:03

这个说M 回收 然后如何如何 原文没有提到啊

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们