逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6060

标记
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz's own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however, Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

小毯子1994 2015-05-11 19:07:01

substantiates用事实支持

1个赞

Susie_yan 2015-09-25 11:22:06

premise:传统观点认为L的discover与N 不相关, premise:L在自己观点发表前有看N的书, counterpremise:L的看书笔记仅仅是有关N早期的部分,L的看书笔记比N的观点更先进。

1个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2016-01-12 19:30:56

一是premise对,criticize对,一和二并不是further information而是相反,错

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们