逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6058

标记
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz's own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however, Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

小毯子1994 2015-05-11 19:06:20

ABC有着相同的错误,defend表示支持而非反对

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2016-01-12 17:41:13

不是defend

0个赞

zkw7295 2016-04-24 15:10:08

1,BF1:对于第二个观点,C的理解是 intermediate conclusion ,而D的理解是conclusion that the historian criticizes,D比C多表达出了观点二和观点一之间的转折关系,即D比C更加准确。(不准确的话容易引起歧义) 我自己的想法:所谓intermediate conclusion很可能就是表示BF1是作者的中间结论,然而很明显,中间这个结论正是作者要反驳的,最后一个however才是最重要的,引出作者观点

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们