逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6059

标记
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz's own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however, Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian's own position.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

fighting4g 2015-11-19 13:13:47

第一个是主要立场反面的evidence,第二个是主要立场面的evidence(尽管前文有conclusion,这里不是结论)

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2016-01-12 11:49:49

首先看两个黑体之间的逻辑关系,两个黑体之间有一个however,说明是转折的关系。第一个黑体是相对客观;第二个黑体是相对主观。 再看整段的逻辑,第一个黑体之前还有一个however,说明整段是正(historian的冒号就只管第一句话)反(第一个黑体)反(第二个黑体),说明第一个黑体反对historian,第二个黑体支持historian。 注意:defend,防守=支持;criticize,批评=削弱

0个赞

不考到730誓不罢休的小星星 2016-09-08 18:41:49

BG:Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus.Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. C1:It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. P1:Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. P2:since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, P3: and since the notes were written before Leibniz's own development of calculus concepts and techniques, C2:Several scholars have argued that the traditional view is false P4:Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented. C3:HistorianA more cautious conclusion than this is called for

0个赞

onlyjx 2016-07-17 14:49:36

要做对这道题首先要弄明白这段话在干什么,就是前面是历史学家在反驳别人的观点,只有however后面的内容是历史学家发表自己的观点

0个赞

Sherry系谢无敌 2016-02-28 07:46:01

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however第一个转折, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the这个是Several scholars 的结论 traditional view is false. 这个是Historian的结论A more cautious conclusion than this指的是traditional view is false说明之前的结论不谨慎,也就是反驳 is called for, however第二个转折. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented. 两个黑体字之间只有一个转折,说明两个黑体字是相悖的。 实际上有三个结论,第一个是传统的说independent,第二个是Several scholars 的说传统的是错的,证据包括第一个黑体。第三个才是Historian的,说第二个不严谨,证据是最后的黑体。 个人愚见

0个赞

Sherry系谢无敌 2016-02-28 07:45:14

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however第一个转折, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the这个是Several scholars 的结论 traditional view is false. 这个是Historian的结论A more cautious conclusion than this指的是traditional view is false说明之前的结论不谨慎,也就是反驳 is called for, however第二个转折. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented. 两个黑体字之间只有一个转折,说明两个黑体字是相悖的。 实际上有三个结论,第一个是传统的说independent,第二个是Several scholars 的说传统的是错的,证据包括第一个黑体。第三个才是Historian的,说第二个不严谨,证据是最后的黑体。 个人愚见

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-08-04 15:31:37

conclusion1-evidence1-conclusion2-HOWEVER,evidence2。所以2并不是结论,而是有一个author用来支持自己观点的一个evidence(自己的观点没有在进一步阐述了)

0个赞

Ripples 2015-05-03 20:44:25

黑脸 Position1 老观点: 结论1 Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Position2 新观点(however转折)(1)Evidence: Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics.(2)原因 Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz's own development of calculus concepts and techniques, 结论2 it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. 立场3 A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however, 立场3:Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented. 注意文章开头的Historian:说明文章的最终结论从属于historian,所以立场3是historian的观点。 立场1是老观点,立场2是scholar的观点 黑脸1从属于立场2,是立场2的evidence 黑脸2从属于立场3,是立场3的结论 分析选项:5个选项都提到historian,主要看后半句,那当然是D了

0个赞

raymondilmlibra 2014-12-16 21:29:31

题目内容的逻辑结构是三个部分: 1、背景:It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. 2、Scholars的观点(在两个since的后面)—— it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false 3、Historian的观点是在最后: A more cautious conclusion than this is called for... 错误的把第一个粗体部分理解成支持historian的观点了,实质上是some scholars的观点,而historian是批判这个观点的。同时两个粗体部分存在着递进的关系,因此所指向的意思是相反的。

0个赞

思璇 2014-12-13 19:56:44

历史学界批评的;历史学家自己的观点 ps:The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends;是支持的; 中间的;

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们