逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6036

标记
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

【选项】These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Stella1228 2016-01-04 00:40:35

原文说的是sulfites,加不加入潜在的allergenic 物质与原文无关

0个赞

Rae_Chan 2015-04-29 10:14:02

sulfity亚硫酸盐

0个赞

Stella1228 2016-01-04 00:40:36

原文说的是sulfites,加不加入潜在的allergenic 物质与原文无关

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-21 11:23:46

不在讨论范围内

0个赞

咩ssimo_Lucky 2016-11-22 16:57:59

P 很多人对特定的亚硝酸盐过敏,其中包括那些加到红酒里的亚硝酸盐; 有些红酒制造商不加亚硝酸盐 C 那些对亚硝酸盐过敏的人可以和这个红酒制造商的红酒 A 相当于把原文再说一遍 E 取非就是——s天然就存在在酒中,且量足以产生过敏现象,那么无论制造商加不加,都会过敏

0个赞

Sherry彭 2016-07-13 18:35:20

大招:看最长否定句。这里有否定,但是否定成分在从句,威力小,先放着,对比下后面的选项

0个赞

Stella1228 2016-01-04 00:40:37

原文说的是sulfites,加不加入潜在的allergenic 物质与原文无关

0个赞

veravane 2015-10-14 14:41:43

只是重复了原文

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-10-11 11:08:17

A原文已经说了没有加s,选项潜台词就=A,有点重复原文之嫌 不妥; D除了s,没有其他能导致过敏的; E取非:s天然就存在在酒中,且量足以产生过敏现象-->没有添加,自然的还是有 有效削弱; 【跟D 相比,E更加贴近关于S的概念】

0个赞

katherinezwj 2015-08-14 11:18:50

A. 取非后,这些制酒厂不能用没有sulfites的方式保存酒,没有提及过敏的人能不能喝,错误。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们