逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5933

标记
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-08-09 18:21:58

注意审题,题目问的是urban unemployment ,城市失业率。即使更多农民种植,也不会增加城市就业

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-03-30 10:56:54

更多人种植而不加工,说明大家留在农村,不在城市,城市失业率怎么会减少呢?

0个赞

Oooohhh 2016-10-11 22:04:23

人数比较与argument无关,无关选项

0个赞

羊羊羊94 2016-07-27 15:15:33

farming的人多,人少的process那些人受到的伤害还是依旧存在。不是因为收益的人多余受损害的人,就能推出某项政策是好是坏。况且也并未提及和失业率关系。

0个赞

gjf1995315 2016-05-28 16:35:24

文中并未说有tariff的话会对农民产生什么影响

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-10 11:25:58

如果种植的比加工的多,可能是加强选项或者无关选项

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-09-20 23:00:10

更多人从事farming than processsing,无关,杀

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们