逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5891

标记
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

2个赞

Benwant700 2014-09-13 16:23:32

第一句是全文的目标 且是作者想要达成的 作者reject的是 by purchasing land 这个strategy;这里ill-conceived不是organizations的goal,这个goal也没有被rejects,而是需要达到

0个赞

gaoyi2202 2015-06-21 18:54:26

Goal是目标,未被驳回,仅仅是plan ill-conceived而已。

0个赞

kay531 2013-09-26 21:08:47

The argument沒有reject goal

0个赞

Port1a 2016-12-06 21:22:10

不是目标ill-conceived 是plan

0个赞

Port1a 2016-12-06 21:22:03

不是目标ill-conceived 是plan

0个赞

Nefertari1208 2016-11-06 21:26:13

分清楚plan和goal,作者反对的,认为需要改变的是purchase这个plan,而不是加黑的goal

0个赞

SuperFreDWWW 2016-10-06 23:42:18

【目的】环境组织想要防止W地区周边土地的住宅化发展。 【方法1】从拥有土地的农夫手中买下土地。 【方法1的问题1】如果农夫想卖土地,他会卖给出价最高的,而开发商会出最高价。 【方法1的问题2】农夫不会卖土地,因为他们可以依靠农业生活。 【方法2的基础】如果农场无法实现现代化,农业就不可行;而大多数农民缺乏实现现代化的经济资源。 【方法2的建议】这正是为什么,一个更明智的保护措施应该要帮助农民实现现代化并因此保证农业的活力。 【选项分析】第一部分是作者支持的目标,而不是作者拒绝的目标;第二部分是作者拒绝方法1的原因,而不是作者拒绝这个目标的原因。

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-09-15 06:37:45

文章结构:goal-strategy1-ill-conceived-bad reasons-支持goal 所以第一句话的goal文章结论是支持的。并咩有reject as ill。

0个赞

summersummerfun 2016-08-04 15:12:45

看清题目啊啊,那个plan是ill-conceived 这个goal是希望能实现的

0个赞

LysaEsperando 2016-04-18 11:19:21

the goal:to preserve the land surrounding. The goal is not ill-conceived or not attainable; the strategy is problematic.

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-11-07 15:10:45

还是要看清楚全文!goal-strategy1-not good reason -strategy2;所以第一个目标不是文章reject的!

0个赞

秋秋 2015-10-24 09:58:51

粗心,第一句的后面才讲到了plan to 的事情,第一句只是一个目的,而不是计划。后面反驳的是他的计划。从最后一句说要制定一个更sensible的战略就可以看出来

0个赞

libeili 2015-10-19 12:43:01

这个goal不是作者反对的 ,而达到这个goal的plan是作者反对的

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们