逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5309

标记
Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

【选项】Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

2个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-06 15:21:54

部分O公司的员工每人有超过一个工作事故。这仅仅说了O公司部分员工的情况,既没有告诉我P公司员工的情况,也没有告诉O公司整体的情况。更不可能得出O和P之间的比较。

0个赞

WickyGmat 2014-08-08 09:35:28

开始我考虑的是fewer employees have job-related accidents,但是其实原文是the employees have fewer job-related accidents,这样一来就可the accidents per person没有关系了

0个赞

love刘小宅 2016-02-24 15:21:26

Several employees 个体能说明什么问题呢

0个赞

Monicca 2016-11-25 17:09:23

several这种表示少量的词一般不用于削弱

0个赞

励志yy 2016-10-24 11:00:17

The report refers to all the employees but not several.

0个赞

励志yy 2016-10-24 10:51:33

the report refer to all employees, but not several employees.

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-07 11:39:32

迷惑选项,一人多伤,看似o好像工伤也不少,可是这与最后o比p工伤少的结果无关,没有起到削弱作用

0个赞

starjx 2015-08-14 11:07:06

我的逻辑:一名员工有超过一次的accident,说明employee有accident的数量少并不能推出总的数量少。其实题目讲的就是accident的数量,而不是employee的数量,因此无关。-题目没有理解清楚的结果

0个赞

wong20gogogo 2015-08-07 21:40:29

several 不具有代表性

0个赞

zxlzxl750 2015-04-26 19:23:34

比较类型的题,答案多是包含两个比较的主体的

0个赞

ritarong 2015-02-21 11:47:22

以小推大 错

0个赞

ritarong 2015-02-21 11:38:22

several不具代表性

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们