逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5260

标记
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

【选项】In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

floramimi 2014-07-01 16:12:16

这个是迷惑选项,文中得出结论的依据是会不会伤害其他人的利益,但是这个选项虽然强调了死亡率高,但是作者不care啊,百分百死也是那些人自己选择的权利,没有削弱

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-23 05:32:02

大多数不戴安全带的乘客受伤比起带安全带的,无关,杀

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-06 21:07:33

对于迷惑选项和真选项之间往往出不来。还是对逻辑链不肯定,对题型不熟悉

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-05 11:05:04

不带安全带的比带安全带的死伤的人更多,这是常识啊,也就是argument的潜在后果,并不会削弱argument,是跟d选项很像的选项。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们