逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5259

标记
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

【选项】The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat-belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-23 05:33:04

不强制带安全带的自动车死亡率比有强制的高,无关,杀

0个赞

gmat考得好 2016-11-21 18:45:35

rate of fatalites是无关的量,文中的逻辑是只要没伤害别人,他们就可以选择

0个赞

honeydew 2016-10-15 17:55:51

原文没有比较,选项加入比较,杀。

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-05 11:03:50

有强制法律的州的死伤率比没有强制法律州的死伤率要低很多,是在说明反对者的argument的可能后果,但是与是否危害他人并没有直接关系,这句话是对的,但是不能用来削弱argument。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们