逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5110

标记
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

【选项】For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

2个赞

慕一 2014-05-15 18:44:14

原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,与原文不符所以错误。太绝对了。

0个赞

raymondilmlibra 2014-12-09 19:15:19

错选了E,题目给出了trade embargo成功的两个要素是啊a hihg degree of international accord&total blockade,没有提到关于trade opinions需要unanimous的问题,因此排除

0个赞

两个月无限可能 2014-12-03 05:00:39

注意绝对性的选项, 推论的题目不能超出原文的概念.

0个赞

krystalssh 2017-01-14 17:50:31

a high degree of both international accord, 不等于must be, 后者太绝对

0个赞

八毛Y 2016-11-09 21:28:07

题目中给出的不是blockade,而是embargo要成功,需要international opinion...

0个赞

sasazz 2016-09-20 15:20:03

一个贸易禁令的成功需要两个必要条件:国际的一致同意和阻止货物进出的能力。所以题目重点是在说禁令成功的条件,和这个相关的题目才能备选。继续看题目,P的禁令成功需要一个完全的封锁,but完全的禁令可能导致国际上不一致。也就是说P禁令成功的两个必要条件是不能同时存在的,那么P禁令不会成功 OG: a high degree of international accord, not unanimity, so this conclusion cannot be justified. 也就是说,原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,与原文不符所以错误。这个选项很容易另人发散,所以我们一定要客观接受原文信息才能做对。

0个赞

徐嘎啦 2016-07-04 09:31:05

OG上的解释,E项,the necessary condition for success is a high degree of international accord, not unanimity, so this conclusion cannot be justified. 也就是说,原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,与原文不符所以错误。这个选项很容易另人发散,所以我们一定要客观接受原文信息才能做对。

0个赞

EmeraldChen 2016-07-01 17:55:31

unanimous 全体一致 但原文中说需要的是 a high degree of accord 高度统一 程度不一样

0个赞

huiminzi1124 2016-06-13 12:46:59

原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,与原文不符所以错误。太绝对了。

0个赞

sub0318 2016-06-03 22:36:40

high degree of accord高度统一不等于unanimous

0个赞

christinasysu 2016-06-03 16:31:06

OG上的解释,E项,the necessary condition for success is a high degree of international accord, not unanimity, so this conclusion cannot be justified. 也就是说,原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,过于绝对化了

0个赞

christinasysu 2016-06-03 16:29:33

E应该用international accord才是对的, 而不是opinion,而且也应该是embargo而不是blockade. 逻辑链: 1. a high degree of international accord + ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country(i.e.blockade) --> trade embargo succeed 2. blockade-->international discord --> trade embargo failed.

0个赞

huiminzi1124 2016-05-13 12:11:07

OG上的解释,E项,the necessary condition for success is a high degree of international accord, not unanimity, so this conclusion cannot be justified. 也就是说,原文讲的是high degree of accord高度统一,而E说的是unanimous 全体一致,与原文不符所以错误。这个选项很容易另人发散,所以我们一定要客观接受原文信息才能做对。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们