逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5076

标记
Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a creditcard logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many creditcard holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?

【选项】The effect noted in the studies is not limited to patrons who have credit cards.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

wujiaqi3347 2014-01-15 15:49:20

这个影响不只限于有信用卡的人。这个选项实则削弱了消费学家的观点。没用信用卡,自然就不是联想到自己有强大的消费能力而付更多的消费了。

0个赞

asd8176 2014-10-04 00:06:26

A effect 不被patron限制,无关。杀。

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-13 10:54:14

饰演的结论作用的范围,无关

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-27 22:33:57

无因有果

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-27 20:19:30

作者假设没有信用卡的人不受影响 A无因有果。反因同果。削弱

0个赞

大玲汁 2015-08-06 13:23:13

研究结果不仅仅试用于有卡一族(对结论——最后一句话——没有支持作用)

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-18 23:57:09

这个影响不会受有credit card的人限制,无关,杀

0个赞

ccorange2004 2014-01-20 07:11:36

the objection of the psychologists are credit-card holders. so it shows that the same phenomenon occurs even when the alleged cause had been removed

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们