逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5063

标记
Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.

The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

【选项】The proportion of marine fish that are caught is as high as the proportion of rain forest trees that are cut down each year.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

fiona0216 2014-07-17 15:07:33

increase in fish caught--resource is no longer endangered increasing rain forests being cut down --no longer endangered real cause is the tech that deplete resources

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-09-18 22:49:39

无关类比

0个赞

2015-03-22 15:19:09

无关

0个赞

LauraX 2014-11-28 20:23:20

类比,文章说砍树其实是无关的,不可选。而且也没有把两者的数量进行比较

0个赞

亦又制造 2014-10-07 16:55:02

我的问题没有看明白。题目问的是: The environmentalist's statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?问的是环境学家的观点如果是正确的话支持了以下哪个结论。 这个结论可以是原文提过的内容改写,做CR的时候一定要根据原文的叙述内容进行相应的分析后再进行细致的考虑,而不能够自己理所应当的认为对于原文改写就是错误的。而应当具体问题具体分析的。

0个赞

sonic 2014-08-07 21:20:01

[脫節]→類比只是舉例,絕非全文的重心

0个赞

sonic 2014-08-07 21:20:00

[脫節]→類比只是舉例,絕非全文的重心

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们