逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5061

标记
Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.

The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

【选项】The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

cocowu 2014-07-12 15:22:06

only fish and forest , not nature~不可擴大SCOPE

0个赞

金大珠 2014-08-27 16:17:46

因为单词不认识encroachment(侵入)所以选错

0个赞

cocowu 2014-07-01 18:45:15

題目中未談到nature, enlarge 題目述訴的scope

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-26 10:58:43

范围扩大

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-09-18 22:48:45

nature 错误,扩大范围

0个赞

snow199511 2016-06-12 11:31:26

看选项时一定要注意概念的问题,避免偷换概念,或者范围大小的变化。nature和鱼的概念偷换。 错误点:switching the terms

0个赞

纯洁小吹吹吹 2016-03-06 21:00:35

on nature太大

0个赞

lisasasali 2015-12-23 11:37:01

主要问题在于鱼是不是濒危而不是高科技的问题,在AE中纠结

0个赞

wqy0516 2015-09-22 05:30:44

A 使用科技是人们蚕食自然的原因,原文说的是捕鱼,并没有说到自然(nature),杀。看选项时一定要注意概念的问题,避免偷换概念,或者范围大小的变化。

0个赞

崔宝宝 2015-05-17 16:49:37

本题是一个结论题,文章内容支持一下哪一个论点。A文章没有提到这么大的概念,它的意思只是否定那个荒谬的想法。

0个赞

香蕉小姐 2015-04-23 22:26:36

encroachment 本身是正确的。但是,这个选项最后说的是on nature,而题干只是提到了marine fish和rain forest,虽然他们都属于自然的范畴,但是不能偷换概念。

0个赞

BlancaKuang 2015-04-10 11:10:51

It's just a supplementary explanation,not about the main conclusion of the environmentalist.

0个赞

ltscy 2015-02-02 18:43:39

encroachment 本身是正确的。但是,这个选项最后说的是on nature.而题干只是提到了marine fish和rain forest,虽然他们都属于自然的范畴,但是这道题告诉我们,他犯了“无端扩大范围”的错误。 要意识到,是不可以推而广之的!

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们