逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5055

标记
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

阿赓 2014-06-11 00:43:42

这题又做错了。。。第二个粗体字前面有however 说明它肯定和第一个是相反的,有相反的意思的只有A选项。 要看懂文章premise和conclusion,这题就做对了。BF1(premise1)--->储户认为银行没事(conclusion1);储户的分析是有问题的(conclusion2)<---BF2(premise2)。对A的疑惑一般在后半句,而BF2用于质疑BF1对于conclusion1的支持。

0个赞

ClaireXu 2015-10-20 16:21:43

12反向所以错。错误原因:没有把握12反向,这很重要!

0个赞

王eee_q 2014-08-03 00:56:08

1.第二个不能认为是evidence 2.两个黑体明显是against ,选项没有against

0个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-05 08:01:57

***两句前后应该相反

0个赞

yttuobao 2015-08-02 23:09:32

Again, the argument is not so much seeking to establish an explanation of its own as it is trying to undermine that inferred by the depositors.

0个赞

JamieSu 2014-12-21 08:25:58

第二个黑体句不是evidence

0个赞

一休妹妹王半仙 2014-07-09 14:59:37

第二个bold只是一个质疑的论据,不是evidence(evidence一定是事实event)

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们