In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
【选项】The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
In knew that this is the main conclusion because it macthes my understanding of why the arguer is arguing in the first place--his intent. Also, we have a contrast keyword attached to it ("however"), and in main point and boldface questions, contrast keywords often signal conclusion. Because the word "since" comes right after "however", I knew the second boldface is evidence supporting the author's main conclusion. I then scanned the answer choices looking at only the second clauses, and eliminating any that didn't say "evidence": Choice A says "gives a reason"---evidence--keep Choice B says "states a conclusion"--conclusion?!--eliminate Choice C--eliminate for same reason as choice B Choice D--"gives an explanation"--an explanation is a type of conclusion, so this choice is saying "gives a conclusion"--eliminate for same reason as choices B and C. Choice E--"provides evidence"--keep. So, I was left with choices A and E. Choice E's first clause says the author is explaining the first bold-face. That's not the case. Instead, the author is saying that the first boldface is not sufficient evidence to support a certain conclusion. That is, the author's argument boils down to: "Just because top execs are buing shares doesn't mean the banks are doing well because they might just be buying shares to give the appearance that the banks are doing well."
因为这个银行的高层买了他们自己的股票(第一划线黑体,是下面第一个结论的 evidence) 所以储户们的担忧释然了。因为他们想既然高层增持股票,说明他们的担忧多虑了。(第一个结论,但不是文章的主结论) 但是,这个推理太乐观了(这个时文章的 conclusion) 因为他们自己增持股票就是为了消除疑虑(第二划线部分,作为文章Conclusion的reason,说明第一个划线黑体作为证据不靠谱)
此处的conclusion 并不是指整个passage得出的结论,而是指作者想要反驳的那个结论
Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic 表明后面不是一个确定的事实而是一个猜测
文中有两个conclusion。 一个是the rumors are false。 另一个是such reasoning is over optimistic。
文章结构 P(several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank)---CP(since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.)----C(Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic)---P(corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.) 第一个黑体是支持了CP 第二个黑体支持了C 两个都是premise 但方向相反 做题时没有理解对选项前半句的意思,以为是说第一句支持文章结论C,实际上supporting a conclusion 这里的 a conclusion是指CP
这道题真的老错,感觉错了有3次以上。 Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank (evidence 1), the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. (conclusion 1) Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic(conclusion 2), however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health (evidence 2). 第二个句子不是解释,只是一个怀疑的论据(猜测)
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank (evidence 1), the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. (conclusion 1) Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic(conclusion 2), however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health (evidence 2). 在读题的时候就分清楚哪些是evidence,哪些是conclusion. 这样就容易理清每句话之间的关系了。 conclusion 1是从evidence 1得出来的。 conclusion 2在质疑conclusion 1. evidence 2 给出了质疑的理由。 --------------- OG 的解释是这样的 第二个黑体并不是一个解释 只是一个怀疑的论据 甚至只是个猜测 所以不能选D 只能选A
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank (evidence 1), the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. (conclusion 1) Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic(conclusion 2), however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health (evidence 2). 这篇文章有可以看成是有两个结论,两个证据
结构是先现象,解释改原因。反驳盖现象,然后提出原因。
BF1和BF2中间出现however,两者反向。BF1给出they reason that的证据支持。BF2前有such reasoning might well be overoptimistic,since,说明BF2是原因question BF1的原因。
2015-11-23 19:53:10 Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank 是证据一,They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.是结论一.证据一用来证明结论一。 Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic是结论二。since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health是证据二 证据二证明结论二,结论二质疑结论一,证据二给结论二质疑结论一提供了一个理由。
1.since开头(注意)因为【top正在买他们公司的股票--这里既是evidence,也可以看成是primise】,原来那些因为谣言(股价会下跌)而恐慌的投资者calm 下来。原因:他们认为自己公司的top买股票说明很有自信公司股票会上涨。但是(重点转折词),这种支持理由太过于乐观了,因为【有可能top故意买股票为了把谣言压下去捏~~--explanation支持作者“太过于乐观”的这个argument conclusion】
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习