逻辑 Critical Reasoning-4896

标记
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

【选项】Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

Cindygmat 2014-09-07 23:20:11

没说到fee arrangements有没有会导致charge怎样,只是说限不限制advertise fee arrangements会导致charge怎样

1个赞

LauraX 2014-11-28 18:11:58

Fee arrangement 不再三段论的三个项中。有some,以偏概全,不选

0个赞

Rae_Chan 2015-04-25 11:45:55

文中说有广告就会降低收费,选项这两个句子都做了广告

0个赞

krystalssh 2017-01-14 15:21:52

文中并没有提到specify fee arrangements, 无关

0个赞

MEDOU 2016-10-24 19:48:08

题干中说成本会降低,矛盾

0个赞

fantasticW 2016-08-07 18:37:20

越少约束,越多lawyer打广告,而且打广告的服务通常比不打的便宜些。因此,如果拿掉一些约束,比如禁止标价,整体市场费用可能会变得更低。文中暗含了一个assumption,即如果lawyer都打广告并且在广告上标价,顾客就有可能从价格战中获益而少付费用。

0个赞

huiminzi1124 2016-05-13 12:37:00

specify fee arrangements是现在的限制之一,如果do not have to 就相当于取消了限制, 而本段的大前提是:取消了限制》打广告多》charge less 所以价格会降低而非增高

0个赞

kaka0806 2015-08-18 11:12:28

specify fee arrangements是现在的限制之一,如果do not have to 就相当于取消了限制, 而本段的大前提是:取消了限制》打广告多》charge less 所以价格会降低而非增高

0个赞

大玲汁 2015-08-02 17:23:10

越少约束,越多lawyer打广告,而且打广告的服务通常比不打的便宜些。因此,如果拿掉一些约束,比如禁止标价,整体市场费用可能会变得更低。文中暗含了一个assumption,即如果lawyer都打广告并且在广告上标价,顾客就有可能从价格战中获益而少付费用。 -- 其实也可以不想那么多,文中很明白地说了,解除禁令会cost down,所以怎么可能会加价呢

0个赞

sonic 2014-08-07 17:23:15

[武斷字眼]--->some

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们