逻辑 Critical Reasoning-4809

标记
Offshore oil-drilling operations entail an unavoidable risk of an oil spill, but importing oil on tankers presently entails an even greater such risk per barrel of oil. Therefore, if we are to reduce the risk of an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, we must invest more in offshore operations and import less oil on tankers.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

【选项】Offshore operations usually damage the ocean floor, but tankers rarely cause such damage.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

HYX 2015-11-21 21:56:51

现在才看见,根本无关,题干全部是 risk of oil spill, 和 other damage 无关

0个赞

renahilary 2014-09-23 12:23:40

目的在于 reduce the risk of an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil 与damage无甚关系

0个赞

fishanne 2016-01-12 11:18:09

结论核心词是 risk of an oil spill 所以其他的非核心的讨论都是无关

0个赞

ChessyG 2016-12-05 06:49:15

if we are to reduce the risk of an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, 措施类题目, focus在是否能reduce,而本选项中在阐述现实状况

0个赞

密密麻麻密密麻麻 2016-12-02 20:05:54

题目说的是risk of oil spill,此选项讲损害ocean floor,无关!

0个赞

二黑要上7 2016-11-02 16:56:51

tankers不造成这个危害不等于不会造成其他危害

0个赞

要考满分的晚琳儿 2016-10-31 14:28:18

与damage无关

0个赞

最爱小苏苏 2016-10-23 15:17:00

文中说的是operation和tanker对oil spill的影响,该选项引入了新的坏影响即对ocean floor的影响,属于无关选项。

0个赞

borax7 2016-10-06 23:38:45

文章核心是漏油风险

0个赞

honeydew 2016-10-05 17:03:12

加强项。

0个赞

honeydew 2016-10-05 17:03:10

加强项。

0个赞

CelesteTOEFL 2016-09-20 10:18:45

这个地方讲的是是否会上海ocean floor,与文章中提出的减少油气泄漏的风险的同时不影响使用这个目标不想关。

0个赞

flyingsophie 2016-02-27 17:50:37

跟海床無關,重點是risk

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们