if you say "subject + clause + IN VERBing", then subject + clause must be an ACTUAL PART of the action of VERBing. e.g. i solved all the problems in OG12 in preparing for the GMAT. --> notice that solving the problems IS ACTUALLY PART OF preparing for the test.
By using逻辑含义上不等于using,其表达的是因为通过那三个方式草根运动才是成功的
by using和using不同;by using修饰的是organise这个动作,是说通过这三个东西的运用才organize成功这个campaign的;而using修饰campaign。这个campaign本身运用了三个东西
* if you say "subject + clause + IN VERBing", then subject + clause must be an ACTUAL PART of the action of VERBing. e.g. i solved all the problems in OG12 in preparing for the GMAT. --> notice that solving the problems IS ACTUALLY PART OF preparing for the test. choice (c) fails here, too, since organizing the campaign (the main clause) is not ACTUALLY PART OF convincing the government.
* if you say "subject + clause + IN VERBing", then subject + clause must be an ACTUAL PART of the action of VERBing. e.g. i solved all the problems in OG12 in preparing for the GMAT. --> notice that solving the problems IS ACTUALLY PART OF preparing for the test. choice (c) fails here, too, since organizing the campaign (the main clause) is not ACTUALLY PART OF convincing the government.
the problem with (c) is that it uses two different transitions incorrectly. * if you say "subject + clause + BY VERBing", then "by VERBing" must explain HOW the main clause occurred. e.g. i prepared for the test by reviewing takeaways on the MGMAT forums. note that the boldface clause describes HOW i prepared for the test. choice (c) means that using websites, etc. was how the industry organized the campaign -- in other words, they used the websites and public meetings to organize the campaign in the first place. that's an incorrect meaning. (the campaign ITSELF used these things; the correct modifier in (a) and (b) shows that relationship.)
, "in convincing" is weak; we want to express that this campaign did the convincing. "In convincing" indicates that this campaign was just part of what convinced the Department.
by using作状语修饰...organize....这整个主句怎么发生的。逻辑意思不对
By using逻辑含义上不等于using,其表达的是因为通过那三个方式草根运动才是成功的
曼哈顿的解释, C错在 * if you say "subject + clause + IN VERBing", then subject + clause must be an ACTUAL PART of the action of VERBing. e.g. i solved all the problems in OG12 in preparing for the GMAT. --> notice that solving the problems IS ACTUALLY PART OF preparing for the test. choice (c) fails here, too, since organizing the campaign (the main clause) is not ACTUALLY PART OF convincing the govern
破折号之间的内容是对于campaign的补充,而不是说它以怎样的方式实现,如果是说后者的话根本不需要破折号直接补充上去就好了。
插入语这里只补充方法,用by有因果关系,改变原文语意。
by using awkward
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习