manhattan说,it 的指代是同词同意,不可能1990年的能量和现在能量是同一个。逻辑意思错了。
it只能做精确指代,这里要用that
manhattan说,it 的指代是同词同意,不可能1990年的能量和现在能量是同一个。逻辑意思错了。
(2) the pronoun 'it' is inappropriate, because 'it' must refer to the ENTIRETY of the noun phrase serving as an antecedent. for instance, the following is an improper sentence: last year's attendance was ten thousand greater than it was this year in the above sentence, the pronoun 'it' must necessarily refer to last year's attendance, not just attendance. the problem in this post has the same issue: the pronoun 'it' must refer to more than ten times as much energy, not just energy - an interpretation that makes no logical sense. therefore, all answer choices containing the pronoun 'it' are wrong.
it是现在的风力发电,1990年是那时候的发电,两者不是同一个,不能用it,用that 或是 the case 更优
it完全指代;
manhattan说,it 的指代是同词同意,不可能1990年的能量和现在能量是同一个。逻辑意思错了。
. It精确指代"现在通过风能产生的电力",这个电力不可能再出现在1990年,故用it造成了该选项逻 辑含义不合理。
manhattan说,it 的指代是同词同意,不可能1990年的能量和现在能量是同一个。逻辑意思错了。
it使用错误,应该用that
it 指代 通过现在的风能发电产生的能源
it是现在的风力发电,1990年是那时候的发电,两者不是同一个,不能用it
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习