The government predicts that costs will be greatly reduced for consumers and businesses that make a large number of long-distance calls by the Federal Communications Commission's recent telephone rate cuts, though some consumer groups disagree with the government's estimates, suggesting they are too optimistic.
语法 Sentence Correction-3542
标记
正确的用户笔记
siasiasia 2016-04-11 17:47:47
被动不好
wjp 2014-11-12 19:55:13
被动语态表达不清晰
CyndiaLee 2015-04-09 09:26:49
by 修饰前面哪部分- 歧义
Monicca 2016-11-21 20:37:38
主动优于被动
Henryhao 2016-11-18 20:32:21
中介的for的结构太多，by在太后面，影响了reduced by 的连贯性
励志yy 2016-11-11 21:48:54
cost be reduced by…，被动语态表达不清晰
ColdSheldon 2016-10-11 08:42:11
Only use passive voice when you have a compelling reason. will be greatly reducedXXXXXXXXXX by 中间隔了一大堆，不好 应该紧跟 reduce动作的发出者 不仅跟的后果是 感觉是 calls 是 FCC打的 歧义
糯米团子QUQ 2016-10-06 22:19:39
对比AB，for consumers and businesses that make a large number of long-distance calls在句子之间的内部顺序有所调整，A清晰，B修饰错误，by the Federal... 是修饰will be reduced还是make a large number of calls不清楚。另外，unacceptable distance between passive-voice action and the agent of that action(by)。
CelesteTOEFL 2016-09-18 13:14:22
夹心修饰
托福必胜！！！ 2016-07-10 08:17:26
1. costs will be reduced by... unnecessary 2. unacceptable distance between passive-voice action and the agent of that action(by)
chuster 2016-06-10 21:25:51
考点：逻辑表达、句子结构逻辑表达，在 GMAT 语法中，主动语态通常优于被动语态，因为被动结构复杂并且不能清楚表达出 施动对象； 介词短语的位置不能随意改变，否则会使修饰对象改变，产生歧义。 句子结构，在主从复杂句子中要注意主句和从句的主谓结构是否齐全，常见的错误选项是缺少主句谓 语。 (A) 正确，for…指"对…而言"。 -------->>>这个for...看成插入语，所以不需要修饰后面的telephone rate cuts？ 其实我读起来是通的，就是不知道这个语法对不对。 (B) cost be reduced by…，被动语态表达不清晰。 (C) 名词prediction不及动词表达更确切；被动语态表达不清晰。 (D) 句子主语是prediction，缺少谓语； 介词短语for…修饰对象错误，应该是修饰FCC，？？？ 而不是the government。 (E) 介词短语for…修饰对象错误，that引导定语从句修饰rate cuts不及直接用's rate cuts简洁。 简洁性；open phrase修饰问题；被动语态。
Egoyiyy 2016-03-16 16:39:32
夹心： by the Federal... 是修饰will be reduced 还是make a large number of calls. 不清楚
