requiring doctors to see more patients and spending中的requiring和spending并列平行作状语修饰最近的动词impose,主语同impose主语是plans。 但是-ing分词作状语有一个很重要的特点,就是要有能make sense的主语,plans与requiring还能搭配,但是和spending就明显不搭了。
spending怎么能由service发出呢
choice e: 'requiring' and 'spending' are parallel in the modifier, implying that the plans themselves spend time with patients (in addition to requiring blah blah blah). this doesn't make sense.
requiring和spending修饰最近的动词impose,但是impose主语是plans,plans是require的发出者,但不能发出spend
requiring doctors to see more patients and spending中的requiring和spending并列平行作状语修饰最近的动词impose,主语同impose主语是plans。 但是-ing分词作状语有一个很重要的特点,就是要有能make sense的主语,plans与requiring还能搭配,但是和spending就明显不搭了。
requiring and spending 表伴随?表结果?语义都十分不和谐。
require表示伴随 逻辑意思错误
D说 P that impose...and require..., Spending...这里的Spending发起者应该是doctors,还算合理 E说 P that impose...,requiring...and spending,这里requiring和spending的发起者变成mddical services,和B一样,MS不可能是spending的主语。
,这里requiring和spending的发起者变成mddical services,和B一样,MS不可能是spending的主语。
choice e: 'requiring' and 'spending' are parallel in the modifier, implying that the plans themselves spend time with patients (in addition to requiring blah blah blah). this doesn't make sense.
如果平行的话spending应该和to see 平行,不对
spending的逻辑主语错误
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习