原文中没有人称的一点不要多加 ,,否则很可能改变原文的语义,,while 可以直接加doing
C 的错误:一,两个they指代不同。二,which 引导的非限制定从有修饰Industrialization and modern methods 的嫌疑。三,感觉at the same 位置的改变有修饰pollutants的嫌疑。 while 可以直接加doing
前面的they指代的是industrialization and modern methods of insect; 后面的they 应该是pollutants
"which" can describe two kinds of constructions: 1/ a plain noun (directly before it) 2/ noun + prep + noun (Local politicians are concerned about the pollutants in the river, which have begun to kill significant numbers of fish). neither of these applies to this sentence; in particular, this sentence is not an example of #2, because "pollutants at the same time" is not a construction ("at the same time" is attached to the entire preceding action, not to "pollutants").
指代一致,相同的代词在同一句子中指代对象必须一致,所以当出现两个选项一个有代词,一个没有代词,需要比较代词是否有指代错误或重复。
如果只是想说服自己那就想they 在一个句子里只能指代同一个东西,这个they have introduced 和之后的they were developed 指代的对象不同。 Ron的解释是这里which的用法错误: nope. "which" is not allowed to do this. "which" can describe two kinds of constructions: 1/ a plain noun (directly before it) 2/ noun + prep + noun (Local politicians are concerned about the pollutants in the river, which have begun to kill significant numbers of fish). neither of these applies to this sentence; in particular, this sentence is not an example of #2, because "pollutants at the same time" is not a construction ("at the same time" is attached to the entire preceding action, not to "pollutants"). so, "which" does not properly refer to anything at all.
一个代词在一句话中只能指代一个东西
如果只是想说服自己那就 想 they 在一个句子里只能指代同一个东西,这个they have introduced 和之后的they were developed 指代的对象不同 Ron的解释是 这里which的用法错误,但是我不能理解 nope. "which" is not allowed to do this. "which" can describe two kinds of constructions: 1/ a plain noun (directly before it) 2/ noun + prep + noun (Local politicians are concerned about the pollutants in the river, which have begun to kill significant numbers of fish). 即简单的跳跃修饰。 neither of these applies to this sentence为什么???; in particular, this sentence is not an example of #2, because "pollutants at the same time" is not a construction ("at the same time" is attached to the entire preceding action, not to "pollutants"). 意识是 pollutants at the same time 作为短语不成立? 好像有点这个意思 pollutants in the river 是个短语 但是pollutants at the same time 不成短语 so, "which" does not properly refer to anything at all.
画线部分的they没有指代对象
句子中有相同的代词要看指代是否一致
整个句子中的两个代词they指代对象不一致,可一个指代industrialization and modern methods ,第二个指代pollutants
句中的they和句后的they指代不同
which指代错误
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习